Benchmark speed?

Discussion in 'Basic4ppc Wishlist' started by DaveW, Nov 7, 2008.

  1. DaveW

    DaveW Active Member Licensed User

    I just did some benchmark speed tests of Basic4PPC compared to NSBasic. I was a bit disappointed with the results. The test is one used by NSB to compare PDAs and is very simple (simplistic really) but good enough for a rough comparison. The code is just a one line loop to see how many iterations can be done in 10 sec:

    Sub App_Start
    Dim limit, counter
    limit = TimeAdd(Now, 0, 0, 10)
    counter = 0
    Do Until Now > limit
    counter = counter + 1
    Msgbox(counter/10 & " iterations per second")
    End Sub

    I ran this on my PDA in both IDE and compiled forms and got values of about 500 and 1100. The same code in NSBasic on the same PDA was 11000 - 10 times faster than B4PPC!

    Is this purely down to .NET?

    (By the way, I have no intentions of going back to NSB, even with this difference. The development speed in B4PPC is 10 times faster than NSB!)
  2. Erel

    Erel Administrator Staff Member Licensed User

    Did you use the optimized compiler?
    This is not purely down to .Net as Basic4ppc can and will improve in the field of calculations speed.
    However there are many other factors that also affect the overall performance of an application.
  3. ceaser

    ceaser Active Member Licensed User

    Hi Dave

    I have used NSB for about 3 years and I am very disappointed that I have not used Basic4PPC earlier. I have wasted 3 years of my life!:sign0137:

    On the speed issue. When I load a combobox with say 2000 coordinate points in NSB, I wait forever. However in B4PPC it is almost immediatly! Also, I use a lot of maths in my Land Surveying program and I have found B4PPC to be much faster than NSB in processing the maths!

  4. Erel

    Erel Administrator Staff Member Licensed User

    You can test the following code (optimized compile it):
    Sub Globals
    Dim limit(1As double
    Dim counter(1As double
    End Sub

    Sub App_Start
    0) = TimeAdd(Now, 0010)
    0) = 0
    Do Until Now > limit(0)
    0) = counter(0) + 1
    Msgbox(counter(0)/10 & " iterations per second")
    End Sub
    On a WM2003 device it shows about 11500 iterations per second.
    The difference is that regular variables are untyped unlike arrays which you can declare with a specific type.
    In one of the next versions this feature of declaring types of regular variables will be added.
    Again, as ceaser wrote there are other factors that also affect the overall performance of your application.
  5. DaveW

    DaveW Active Member Licensed User


    FIrst I need to reiterate that I am still very happy to have moved to Basic4PPC! I have got more coding done in a week than I did in months on NSBasic, it has (generally - see my other posts) been a simple process, debugging is a dream in comparison and the potential to push the limits of what my program will do are far greater. In fact the only problems I have had are in trying to do things I would never had contemplated doing in NSB.

    Anyway, yes I was using the optimised compiler. I tried the new code and it did improve - this time I got 3500, over 3 times faster but still 1/3 the speed of NSBasic.

    I am sure you are right that in other comparisons the results would be very different.

    I only got interested in benchmarking because my program is reading and parsing some text files and as that was taking an appreciable time even on the PC and I wanted to see how the PDA would do. By the way the new benchmark clocks 56000 in the Windows IDE and 1,800,000 as a compiled exe!
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice