Dominex Active Member Licensed User Longtime User Nov 5, 2012 #1 I'm writing a class where I also need a Initialize2 because there are two different ways to make it work, but unfortunately it seems that is not possible, or am I wrong? At the moment if I add Initialize2 for example, and start with this Sub, instead of Initialize , it gives me error because the class has not been initialized.
I'm writing a class where I also need a Initialize2 because there are two different ways to make it work, but unfortunately it seems that is not possible, or am I wrong? At the moment if I add Initialize2 for example, and start with this Sub, instead of Initialize , it gives me error because the class has not been initialized.
J Jost aus Soest Active Member Licensed User Longtime User Nov 6, 2012 #2 You can use so many "Initializer" as you want. (These are just ordinary subs.) For better help show some code!
You can use so many "Initializer" as you want. (These are just ordinary subs.) For better help show some code!
Informatix Expert Licensed User Longtime User Nov 6, 2012 #3 Jost aus Soest said: You can use so many "Initializer" as you want. (These are just ordinary subs.) Click to expand... No, Dominex is right. You cannot have many Initialize (as he said, you'll get an error with any other sub). I support his demand (+1).
Jost aus Soest said: You can use so many "Initializer" as you want. (These are just ordinary subs.) Click to expand... No, Dominex is right. You cannot have many Initialize (as he said, you'll get an error with any other sub). I support his demand (+1).
Dominex Active Member Licensed User Longtime User Nov 6, 2012 #4 Informatix said: No, Dominex is right. You cannot have many Initialize (as he said, you'll get an error with any other sub). I support his demand (+1). Click to expand... I see. Of course, a way around the problem is always there, but it's a different thing. Thank you.
Informatix said: No, Dominex is right. You cannot have many Initialize (as he said, you'll get an error with any other sub). I support his demand (+1). Click to expand... I see. Of course, a way around the problem is always there, but it's a different thing. Thank you.
