Hi,
Not sure this a bug, or works by design...
When you combine a public getter of a property with a private setter, it seems this is not recognized as a property:
It could be useful to be able to do so, for example
- you create a helper class in a library and want to be able to set the property to a value. Since the setter is private, you can do so with CallSub
- the library consumer code should only be able to get the property value. This can be done by reading the property [readOnly].
A workaround of course would be to rename the private setter to another name.
Thanks
Not sure this a bug, or works by design...
When you combine a public getter of a property with a private setter, it seems this is not recognized as a property:
B4X:
Private pDemo as String
...
private sub setDemo (demo as String)
pDemo = demo
end sub
public sub getDemo as string
return pDemo
end subIt could be useful to be able to do so, for example
- you create a helper class in a library and want to be able to set the property to a value. Since the setter is private, you can do so with CallSub
- the library consumer code should only be able to get the property value. This can be done by reading the property [readOnly].
A workaround of course would be to rename the private setter to another name.
Thanks