B Big JR Member Licensed User Longtime User Jul 30, 2013 #1 Am I missing something obvious? If I have two list... List1 containing XYZ BIRDS BIRDS_2 List2 containing xyz_me.mp3 birds_me.mp3 birds_2_user.3gp And I sort both lists, the xyz entries come at the end of the sorts but the birds entries are swapped round. I get... List1 BIRDS BIRDS_2 XYZ List2 birds_2_user.3gp birds_me.mp3 xyz_me.mp3 Shouldn't the lists get sorted as List1 BIRDS BIRDS_2 XYZ List2 birds_me.mp3 birds_2_user.3gp xyz_me.mp3
Am I missing something obvious? If I have two list... List1 containing XYZ BIRDS BIRDS_2 List2 containing xyz_me.mp3 birds_me.mp3 birds_2_user.3gp And I sort both lists, the xyz entries come at the end of the sorts but the birds entries are swapped round. I get... List1 BIRDS BIRDS_2 XYZ List2 birds_2_user.3gp birds_me.mp3 xyz_me.mp3 Shouldn't the lists get sorted as List1 BIRDS BIRDS_2 XYZ List2 birds_me.mp3 birds_2_user.3gp xyz_me.mp3
eps Expert Licensed User Longtime User Jul 30, 2013 #2 This is correct. You are not comparing like with like. BIRDS is a complete search term and therefore comes before the others with extra text in the name. i.e. BIRDS BIRDS_2 BIRDS_A or birds birds_2 birds_a etc... That's the reason BIRDS is at the front. Upvote 0
This is correct. You are not comparing like with like. BIRDS is a complete search term and therefore comes before the others with extra text in the name. i.e. BIRDS BIRDS_2 BIRDS_A or birds birds_2 birds_a etc... That's the reason BIRDS is at the front.
K KPmaster Member Licensed User Longtime User Jul 30, 2013 #3 I get... List1 BIRDS BIRDS_2 XYZ List2 birds_2_user.3gp birds_me.mp3 xyz_me.mp3 Click to expand... What you get is correct, because numbers are processed before characters Upvote 0
I get... List1 BIRDS BIRDS_2 XYZ List2 birds_2_user.3gp birds_me.mp3 xyz_me.mp3 Click to expand... What you get is correct, because numbers are processed before characters