B b4auser1 Well-Known Member Licensed User Longtime User Dec 2, 2015 #1 Is it planned to replace HttpRequest with OkHttpRequest in the jHttpUtils2 ?
Erel B4X founder Staff member Licensed User Longtime User Dec 2, 2015 #2 OkHttp v1.01 is compatible with B4J: https://www.b4x.com/android/forum/threads/okhttp-replaces-the-http-library.54723/#post-343758 jOkHttpUtils2 (B4J version of OkHttpUtils2) library is attached. Attachments jOkHttpUtils2.zip jOkHttpUtils2.zip 7.3 KB · Views: 896 jOkHttpUtils2_Src.zip jOkHttpUtils2_Src.zip 3.5 KB · Views: 837 Upvote 0
OkHttp v1.01 is compatible with B4J: https://www.b4x.com/android/forum/threads/okhttp-replaces-the-http-library.54723/#post-343758 jOkHttpUtils2 (B4J version of OkHttpUtils2) library is attached.
udg Expert Licensed User Longtime User Dec 2, 2015 #3 Should OkHttp 1.01 lib (and jOkHttpUtils2) be put in the internal libraries folder of B4J? Will they coexist with older jHttp/jHttpUtils2 or are we supposed to delete the non-Ok libs? Thanks Upvote 0
Should OkHttp 1.01 lib (and jOkHttpUtils2) be put in the internal libraries folder of B4J? Will they coexist with older jHttp/jHttpUtils2 or are we supposed to delete the non-Ok libs? Thanks
Erel B4X founder Staff member Licensed User Longtime User Dec 2, 2015 #4 udg said: Should OkHttp 1.01 lib (and jOkHttpUtils2) be put in the internal libraries folder of B4J? Click to expand... It doesn't really matter but it is better to copy it to the additional libraries folder. You do not need to delete jHttp or jHttpUtils2. They are not related to these libraries. Upvote 0
udg said: Should OkHttp 1.01 lib (and jOkHttpUtils2) be put in the internal libraries folder of B4J? Click to expand... It doesn't really matter but it is better to copy it to the additional libraries folder. You do not need to delete jHttp or jHttpUtils2. They are not related to these libraries.
