Google vs. Oracle

Hamied Abou Hulaikah

Well-Known Member
Licensed User
Longtime User
WOW, I was following this case news for a while ...

In this case oracle tried to squeeze Google $9B for copying 11k lines of Java API-like code!!
But court decided: APIs can't be strictly copyrighted

This decision makes programmers more saver worldwide, including our love B4X.
 

agraham

Expert
Licensed User
Longtime User
But court decided: APIs can't be strictly copyrighted
Actually they ducked this wider decision (for several pragmatic reasons) and decided on a narrow decision to only settle this case. The decision as I understand it was that even if APIs could be copyrighted then Google's use was fair use under copyright law and was so permissible.
 

aeric

Expert
Licensed User
Longtime User
According to Oracle, Google's APIs had violated Oracle Java copyright because they had duplicated Java APIs' "structure, sequence, and organization."
Just need to rename or refactoring the functions, insert some random code in between, jumble up the sequence a bit and add in some spaghetti will make the lines not look duplicated.
 
Top