Yes I've got that, it is thorough but it's mainly IL. This is good for a more general look at the CLR http://www.amazon.com/CLR-via-Secon...bs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1203008806&sr=1-1 Highly recommended!
-
Welcome to B4X forum!
B4X is a set of simple and powerful cross platform RAD tools:
- B4A (free) - Android development
- B4J (free) - Desktop and Server development
- B4i - iOS development
- B4R (free) - Arduino, ESP8266 and ESP32 development
how to create a database ?
- Thread starter gjoisa
- Start date
- Similar Threads Similar Threads
@Agraham,
Of course you are right. By eyeballing I ment more or less seeing how the data are "spread" before sorting. The algorithm for binary search is no more then 3 lines to find an item in max 27 steps in 133 million entries.
But I think I will take your advice. Still too bad that only from a table a CSV file can be written. I think I did a fairly good job to use a lot of bit-operations to speed up the code.
thnx anyway for your effort.
Marc
Of course you are right. By eyeballing I ment more or less seeing how the data are "spread" before sorting. The algorithm for binary search is no more then 3 lines to find an item in max 27 steps in 133 million entries.
But I think I will take your advice. Still too bad that only from a table a CSV file can be written. I think I did a fairly good job to use a lot of bit-operations to speed up the code.
thnx anyway for your effort.
Marc
I have decided .NET 2.0, VS2005 and Windows Forms will do all I need for the foreseeable future so I haven't loooked at what documentation is available. By the time I get interested (if ever) newer material will be available.
Looks neat but how many times does each line execute? You can do a lot in 81 lines of straight code (I know the comparison is not exact but you see the point!) .
@Agraham,
The three lines execute max 27 times for a hit in a base of 133 million entries, mostly in less.
Marc
The three lines execute max 27 times for a hit in a base of 133 million entries, mostly in less.
Marc
I did say "I know the comparison is not exact but you see the point!".
I stand corrected for not reading properly :sign0013: