David Meier Active Member Licensed User Longtime User Nov 3, 2017 #1 Hi I use searchview but realized that it uses the DoEvents command. And this is now deprecated. Is there an update for the searchview class? Regards David
Hi I use searchview but realized that it uses the DoEvents command. And this is now deprecated. Is there an update for the searchview class? Regards David
D Deleted member 103 Guest Nov 3, 2017 #2 David Meier said: Hi I use searchview but realized that it uses the DoEvents command. And this is now deprecated. Is there an update for the searchview class? Regards David Click to expand... It can still be used anyway. Upvote 0
David Meier said: Hi I use searchview but realized that it uses the DoEvents command. And this is now deprecated. Is there an update for the searchview class? Regards David Click to expand... It can still be used anyway.
DonManfred Expert Licensed User Longtime User Nov 3, 2017 #3 The Class Source is available. You can change it if you want. Upvote 0
Erel B4X founder Staff member Licensed User Longtime User Nov 5, 2017 #4 I've uploaded a new version without it: https://www.b4x.com/android/forum/t...ve-to-autocompleteedittext.19379/#post-111667 Even with 10,000 the index is built quite fast so the simple synchronous approach works good enough. It is possible to add a semi-asynchronous option if it is too slow. Upvote 0
I've uploaded a new version without it: https://www.b4x.com/android/forum/t...ve-to-autocompleteedittext.19379/#post-111667 Even with 10,000 the index is built quite fast so the simple synchronous approach works good enough. It is possible to add a semi-asynchronous option if it is too slow.
M Mahares Expert Licensed User Longtime User Nov 5, 2017 #5 Erel said: I've uploaded a new version without it Click to expand... 1. The only thing I noticed in the new version of SearchView class is the removal of this line from the class. What else is changed? Code: Copy If i Mod100 = 0 Then DoEvents 2. Since there are over 7000 records in the text file, it does not start showing the list until you type the 2nd letter. Example: When you type p, you do not see anything, but the list start appearing when you type the second letter : po, even with a faster processor. . No memory time out. Is that by design or 7000 records indexed is too much? 3. I tried a few months ago to run the original version (the one without the customview in the designer) using this below nice feature: Code: Copy 'Don't forget to add the SetActivityAttribute in the manifest editor (already added in this example) Private Sub IME_HeightChanged (NewHeight As Int, OldHeight As Int) SearchView1.ActivityHeightChanged(NewHeight) End Sub But never was successful, unless I used the SearchView created in the designer. Upvote 0
Erel said: I've uploaded a new version without it Click to expand... 1. The only thing I noticed in the new version of SearchView class is the removal of this line from the class. What else is changed? Code: Copy If i Mod100 = 0 Then DoEvents 2. Since there are over 7000 records in the text file, it does not start showing the list until you type the 2nd letter. Example: When you type p, you do not see anything, but the list start appearing when you type the second letter : po, even with a faster processor. . No memory time out. Is that by design or 7000 records indexed is too much? 3. I tried a few months ago to run the original version (the one without the customview in the designer) using this below nice feature: Code: Copy 'Don't forget to add the SetActivityAttribute in the manifest editor (already added in this example) Private Sub IME_HeightChanged (NewHeight As Int, OldHeight As Int) SearchView1.ActivityHeightChanged(NewHeight) End Sub But never was successful, unless I used the SearchView created in the designer.
Erel B4X founder Staff member Licensed User Longtime User Nov 5, 2017 #6 1. The progress dialog was also removed. 2. Change MIN_LIMIT in the class globals to 1. It should still be fast. 3. This question is not related to this thread. Upvote 0
1. The progress dialog was also removed. 2. Change MIN_LIMIT in the class globals to 1. It should still be fast. 3. This question is not related to this thread.
David Meier Active Member Licensed User Longtime User Nov 6, 2017 #7 Erel said: I've uploaded a new version without it: https://www.b4x.com/android/forum/t...ve-to-autocompleteedittext.19379/#post-111667 Even with 10,000 the index is built quite fast so the simple synchronous approach works good enough. It is possible to add a semi-asynchronous option if it is too slow. Click to expand... Dear Erel Thank you so much for this! I am happy that you changed it so I am sure, it is a quality solution. Regards David Upvote 0
Erel said: I've uploaded a new version without it: https://www.b4x.com/android/forum/t...ve-to-autocompleteedittext.19379/#post-111667 Even with 10,000 the index is built quite fast so the simple synchronous approach works good enough. It is possible to add a semi-asynchronous option if it is too slow. Click to expand... Dear Erel Thank you so much for this! I am happy that you changed it so I am sure, it is a quality solution. Regards David
