Exactly ! If you are able to edit the source code understanding it as a programmer for 5%, but requesting some supplier (knowing the language for 100.0%) for the updating the source code according to your analyzed need - you act as a architect or analyst.the programmer and the programming ANALYST.
Tony Stark:
[After seeing the gold 3-D render of his suit] A little ostentatious, don't you think?
JARVIS:
[dripping with sarcasm] What was I thinking? You're usually so discreet.
Stark:
Tell you what. Throw a little hot-rod red in there.
JARVIS:
Oh yes. That should help you keep a low profile. [seconds later] The render is complete.
Stark:
[upon seeing the new render] Hey, I like it. Fabricate it, paint it.
JARVIS:
Beginning automated assembly. Estimated completion time is five hours.
Stark:
Don't wait up for me, honey.
Are you sure you are vibe coding for B4R?Actually, i'm vibe coding for B4R latest months.
Maybe better idea is to switch to Arduino directly, but ... good habit is always habit
So, in short i can state that, in whole, no big difference between Deepseek, Qwen and the godness ChatGPT. Just speed and talkativeness.
They all know B4R not so good like needed for me.
But after long reiterating prompting - it's possible to make the code that you know yourself superficially (C++).
But i hope that i'm a programmer not for 5%, but for maybe even 10, and understand a bit what i'm compiling.too risky
In my opinion, vibe coding is not suitable for B4R. Vibe coders dont examine the code and just run it by trial and error. Brute force until it works what you expected. It's fine for web app or front end.But i hope that i'm a programmer not for 5%, but for maybe even 10, and understand a bit what i'm compiling.![]()