In addition, I think license verification should be moved to the command line builders - this way we don't need to have the IDE installed to use the command line compilers; this would allow us to create cross-platform IDEs.Might be added in a future version. The building process is more complicated in B4i compared to B4A and B4J.
I'm assuming that the compilation is done by the local/hosted builders, right?Sorry but a minimum example will not help. The process depends on all kinds of factors. This is currently not supported.
True.I'm assuming that the compilation is done by the local/hosted builders, right?
Such a builder might be created in the future. I don't think that it will be used by many developers.If they are then why not just create a CLI tool that replicates what the IDE does (sending data to the builders)?
Not really. There are many other much more complicated challenges that you need to solve if you want to develop a new IDE.this way we don't need to have the IDE installed to use the command line compilers; this would allow us to create cross-platform IDEs.
The biggest hurdle would be licensing though that could be solved by having the compilers handle licensing rather than the IDEs. Another hurdle is the designer but there are various solutions I could see using.Not really. There are many other much more complicated challenges that you need to solve if you want to develop a new IDE
@Erel,True.
Such a builder might be created in the future. I don't think that it will be used by many developers.
Not really. Thhere are many other much more complicated challenges that you need to solve if you want to develop a new IDE.
Which problem are you trying to solve?because on compile logs is very difficult to understand