D Deleted member 103 Guest Jul 20, 2016 #1 Hi, I have created from a jar-file a exe-file. When I run the exe file to another PC then comes this error message. On the other PC Java (jre1.8.0_101) is installed. Can anyone tell me what's wrong with my configuration?
Hi, I have created from a jar-file a exe-file. When I run the exe file to another PC then comes this error message. On the other PC Java (jre1.8.0_101) is installed. Can anyone tell me what's wrong with my configuration?
D Deleted member 103 Guest Jul 20, 2016 #2 Now I have the Java version jre1.8.0_60 installed and working. Question! why this version is absolutely necessary if the configuration "Min JRE version: 1.8.0_60" is? Upvote 0
Now I have the Java version jre1.8.0_60 installed and working. Question! why this version is absolutely necessary if the configuration "Min JRE version: 1.8.0_60" is?
Erel B4X founder Staff member Licensed User Longtime User Jul 20, 2016 #3 Maybe it was not configured as the default java. You can check it from the command line by running java -version Upvote 0
Maybe it was not configured as the default java. You can check it from the command line by running java -version
Erel B4X founder Staff member Licensed User Longtime User Jul 20, 2016 #4 Note that there aren't really good reasons to use Launch4j. If you want to create a simple and standard installer for your app then you should use B4J packager. It will embed the JRE in the installer instead of relying on the system java. Upvote 0
Note that there aren't really good reasons to use Launch4j. If you want to create a simple and standard installer for your app then you should use B4J packager. It will embed the JRE in the installer instead of relying on the system java.
D Deleted member 103 Guest Jul 21, 2016 #5 Erel said: Note that there aren't really good reasons to use Launch4j. If you want to create a simple and standard installer for your app then you should use B4J packager. It will embed the JRE in the installer instead of relying on the system java. Click to expand... Hi Erel, I have already tried the "B4J packager", unfortunately it does not work. This is my Konfiguation. It comes not an error message and it does not create a setup file. Upvote 0
Erel said: Note that there aren't really good reasons to use Launch4j. If you want to create a simple and standard installer for your app then you should use B4J packager. It will embed the JRE in the installer instead of relying on the system java. Click to expand... Hi Erel, I have already tried the "B4J packager", unfortunately it does not work. This is my Konfiguation. It comes not an error message and it does not create a setup file.
Erel B4X founder Staff member Licensed User Longtime User Jul 21, 2016 #6 Is there any message in the logs? Have you installed inno setup? Upvote 0
D Deleted member 103 Guest Jul 22, 2016 #8 works now! The problem was in Java, there were konflickte with several versions. But now I have a new problem. After installing my program looks like But if I run the jar file it looks like this. Why are the bitmaps of the buttons are not visible? Upvote 0
works now! The problem was in Java, there were konflickte with several versions. But now I have a new problem. After installing my program looks like But if I run the jar file it looks like this. Why are the bitmaps of the buttons are not visible?
Erel B4X founder Staff member Licensed User Longtime User Jul 22, 2016 #9 Make sure to use the latest version of jFX library: https://www.b4x.com/android/forum/threads/updates-to-internal-libaries.48274/#post-408999 Upvote 0
Make sure to use the latest version of jFX library: https://www.b4x.com/android/forum/threads/updates-to-internal-libaries.48274/#post-408999
D Deleted member 103 Guest Jul 22, 2016 #10 I solved the problem. But I think that the problem in the IDE is. The had added the bitmaps with the designer. Now I have added the bitmaps via code and it works. Upvote 0
I solved the problem. But I think that the problem in the IDE is. The had added the bitmaps with the designer. Now I have added the bitmaps via code and it works.
Erel B4X founder Staff member Licensed User Longtime User Jul 22, 2016 #11 Are you using jFX v4.24? Upvote 0
D Deleted member 103 Guest Jul 22, 2016 #12 Erel said: Are you using jFX v4.24? Click to expand... I currently use jFX v4.21 Upvote 0
D Deleted member 103 Guest Jul 22, 2016 #13 Thank Erel! With jCore v4.21 and jFX v4.24 works perfectly. Upvote 0
imbault Well-Known Member Licensed User Longtime User Jul 23, 2016 #14 Filippo said: I currently use jFX v4.21 Click to expand... I've no pb either with 4.24 Upvote 0
