Everyone will soon have their own server at home

Troberg

Well-Known Member
Licensed User
Longtime User
virtualize them onto a decent sever with vmware

I need more CPU power, than what's feasible with that solution. Also, there's a limit to how many disks I can stick into one server. Another important reason is to not have a massive "kill-all single point of failure".
 

sorex

Expert
Licensed User
Longtime User
it all depends on how expensive you want to go.

you can use 2 vmware servers and put the data on a san/nas.

if a server goes down it will start the virtual machines that were running on the dead one on the other one.

but then again, you still have a single point of failure, the san. so you need 2 who do live sync.

a bit of overkill for a home solution
 

LucaMs

Expert
Licensed User
Longtime User


I "found" a smart operator in Infostrada (1/7 is a good number )

From:


To:
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…