AnandGupta Expert Licensed User Longtime User May 26, 2024 #2 The problem is with 7 Extra lines added to get 7 angles. Also UK do not cross 7.
josejad Expert Licensed User Longtime User May 27, 2024 #4 It is a fake that circulated on the internet as a powerpoint a few years ago.
LucaMs Expert Licensed User Longtime User May 27, 2024 #5 josejad said: It is a fake that circulated on the internet as a powerpoint a few years ago. Click to expand... The value of the numbers probably wasn't affected by the number of angles, but... they match (except for 7, maybe). It will be by chance
josejad said: It is a fake that circulated on the internet as a powerpoint a few years ago. Click to expand... The value of the numbers probably wasn't affected by the number of angles, but... they match (except for 7, maybe). It will be by chance
Daestrum Expert Licensed User Longtime User May 27, 2024 #6 Looks like someone making the numbers fit their theory. I have never seen anyone write an 8 like that, plus numerals 2, 3, 5, 6, 8 and 9 usually contain curves.
Looks like someone making the numbers fit their theory. I have never seen anyone write an 8 like that, plus numerals 2, 3, 5, 6, 8 and 9 usually contain curves.
LucaMs Expert Licensed User Longtime User May 27, 2024 #7 Daestrum said: Looks like someone making the numbers fit their theory. I have never seen anyone write an 8 like that, plus numerals 2, 3, 5, 6, 8 and 9 usually contain curves. Click to expand... In those days they didn't know how to draw circles (they didn't even have a compass), only straight lines ?
Daestrum said: Looks like someone making the numbers fit their theory. I have never seen anyone write an 8 like that, plus numerals 2, 3, 5, 6, 8 and 9 usually contain curves. Click to expand... In those days they didn't know how to draw circles (they didn't even have a compass), only straight lines ?
AnandGupta Expert Licensed User Longtime User May 27, 2024 #8 LucaMs said: In those days they didn't know how to draw circles (they didn't even have a compass), only straight lines ? Click to expand... Nah. Then zero would have four angles.
LucaMs said: In those days they didn't know how to draw circles (they didn't even have a compass), only straight lines ? Click to expand... Nah. Then zero would have four angles.
rabbitBUSH Well-Known Member Licensed User Longtime User May 27, 2024 #9 AnandGupta said: Nah. Then zero would have four angles. Click to expand... unless it was a decagon giving it 10 angles (angels???) = the tenth digit - unless your environment starts the number sequence with Zero (of course).......then it would have zero angles - as in before the invention of the concept of zero.....
AnandGupta said: Nah. Then zero would have four angles. Click to expand... unless it was a decagon giving it 10 angles (angels???) = the tenth digit - unless your environment starts the number sequence with Zero (of course).......then it would have zero angles - as in before the invention of the concept of zero.....
