the binaries for B4X products are currently 32-bit.
without meaning to spark any controversy - any known/ planned plans to move to 64-bit?
without meaning to spark any controversy - any known/ planned plans to move to 64-bit?
There is no real need for general purpose CPUs that can handle 128 bit wide data natively. Memory interfaces more than 64 bits wide are useful to increase transfer speeds but having a 128 bit CPU will just use twice the memory of a 64 bit one for addresses and pointers for no real world benefit (at the current time).Indeed, it is strange that 128-bit processors ...
that's because he earns more then I doEven my 12-year-old('s) laptop is a 64bit.
I guess so; and, the bland side of that is that one then has to produce two versions (as one sees on download sites).however it will not run on 32 bit computers.
128-bit processors
Weeeell, boy would it have been useful. My buddy and I both had jobs where the modelling exercises could have done with that. BUT, a 64-bit with multi-core multi-threading proved just as useful from a number crunching viewpoint - but - NOT in any way intuitive to program. When you witness things going from days to hours to minutes to seconds in execution time its quite awesome. (then, of course, there was breaking into the graphic coprocessor back in the old days to speed computation up.)There is no real need for general purpose CPUs that can handle 128 bit wide data natively.
I earn about € 9,873.48... per month, but I'm stingy and don't spend it on a new laptop as long as it survives. ?that's because he earns more then I do
you must be a parliamentarian in cape town ? they're also stingy€ 9,873.48