Wish #AdditionalJar: relative location

PaulR

Active Member
Licensed User
Longtime User
I know we can keep a .jar in the project directory and refer to it's absolute location, but this isn't good for portability and the Additional Libraries location is not appropriate for project-specific code either. It would be good to be able to use a relative location, or to have b4a search the project directory first, to solve this issue.

Thanks for reading.
 

PaulR

Active Member
Licensed User
Longtime User
It's not ideal when using version control though. If relative locations are already in use with the additional libraries folder then perhaps scanning the project folder for the .jar would be a solution?
 

ac9ts

Active Member
Licensed User
Longtime User
Adding a bump to this wish.

I would like to use specific versions of libraries (for various reasons) that would conflict with other apps if they were installed in the Additional Libraries folder. It would be nice is if the compiler would use the same directory structure as the Simple Library Compiler. Basically, if there is a "libs" directory in the "Objects" directory, use those libraries before looking in the Additional Libraries folder.
 
Top