I didn't say that I use it, I said that I found it. I believe that AlwaysBusy uses it a lot in B4J from my research on the forum after I found ==. The fact that you can use == but not != in B4X I found a bit strange, to me that's just incomplete having one without the other.
Me personally, I'm more interested in += and -= and &= than anything else. Just being able to write Salvatore += 1 or Salvatore -= 1 is a time saver and also makes for neater code. But saying that, Salvatore++, Salvatore--, ++Salvatore, --Salvatore are also time savers too.
now that B4A is free, I for one am expecting more developers to try out B4X and to join the band wagon. I can't be the only developer on the planet that when using other IDEs enjoy using the other operators that are missing from B4X suite of RAD tools.
Hey, those missing operators += and -= and &= should be in a modern day IDE RAD tool like B4X, especially when == is already in the IDE, and == is a really really really old operator.
Salvatore = Salvatore + 1
Or
Salvatore += 1
I know which one I prefer.
B4X prides itself on being a modern day RAD tool...