Wish Definition von "Type" als Private

D

Deleted member 103

Guest
Hi,

Here again the request, it is really very important.
I accidentally found the error in my app.
I defined this variable in main module and in a library, so compilation was not possible.
All error messages had no indication of the variable.
B4X:
Type Point (x As Int, y As Int)
 

LucaMs

Expert
Licensed User
Longtime User
Although having the possibility to define private a type can be useful, I did not understand your post (you've probably used the term variable instead of type).

I can have a type defined in a class of a library, like:

Type tPoint(x as int, y as int)

and the same in a project without "conflicts".

[beautiful, unuseful, almost empty library named Buttami2.jar with that type defined]
 

Attachments

  • Buttami2.zip
    2.6 KB · Views: 272
  • Type test.zip
    7.7 KB · Views: 269
D

Deleted member 103

Guest
Although having the possibility to define private a type can be useful, I did not understand your post (you've probably used the term variable instead of type).
Yes you are right. :(

But this is about B4i and not B4a, and maybe that makes the difference.
 
D

Deleted member 103

Guest
I'm sure that private types will be added at some point. Still, it is not recommended to create a type named Point. Add a two or three letter prefix (ex: FPPoint).
Thank you in advance.
 
Top