Quiz: find the new feature :)

[lemonisdead]

will allow you to kill the app definitively.

I wonder if Erel thought to create ExitApplicationDefinitivelyAndUninstallIt ?

 

[An Schi]

Nah....the next thing should be:
StartServiceAtNoMatterWhatAndroidOrManufacturorOrPowersavingSays

 

[EnriqueGonzalez]

my... i am getting paranoic, i thought such feature already existed.

i used to write code and usually the IDE gave me the right autocompletion... that or i was very lucky!

 

[LucaMs]

Stop! You are O.T. ! Let do it to me

I would like to know if, among the many pending "wishes", there are also "important" things that can improve enough b4a and make it even more "desirable".


[I have a list of my old "wishes" ]

 

[lemonisdead]

make it even more "desirable".

Ah, you too would like it to act as a real IDE ?

 

[LucaMs]

Ah, you too would like it to act as a real IDE ?

I don't know the difference; I forgot any IDE, I just use this one, now (and in the next 10 years ).

Anyway, I was talking about b4a in general, not about IDE.

 

[lemonisdead]

Anyway, I was talking about b4a in general, not about IDE

Ah OK. Anywhere is lucky so to have a captive client for 10 years from now... Feel free yo post in the right section (it's free and does not cost). So we could bet on the availabilities

 

[Erel]

I would like to know if, among the many pending "wishes", there are also "important" things that can improve enough b4a and make it even more "desirable".

This is a very important feature. The "implicit" autocomplete is a great feature and this improvements makes it significantly better.
As a general rule it is a mistake and also meaningless to compare a new implemented feature to an unrelated feature request.

 

[LucaMs]

This is a very important feature.

I meant: other important features!
Customers (us, in this case) are never satisfied

As a general rule it is a mistake and also to compare a new implemented feature to an unrelated feature request.

Stop! You are O.T. ! Let do it to me

but your'e right, I write too often

meaningless

things.

Maybe I should stop writing posts!

 

[lemonisdead]

Maybe I should stop writing posts

Nooooope. You have to acknowledge considering important what important is for Sir Uziel, not for yo
You signed for 10 years, remember

 

[Beja]

Don't pass (max var)

 

[DonManfred]

Who can find it?

Spoiler: my Guess

The IDE knows where the cursor is and only allow commands which are allowed at this line of code. (Scope?)
In the sample it does not allow a definition of a private variable. Only Private Sub is available at this point so the ide only suggests PrivateSub in the contextmenu....

 

[Erel]

In the sample it does not allow a definition of a private variable. Only Private Sub is available at this point so the ide only suggests PrivateSub in the contextmenu....

You are correct that the IDE could have limited the choices in this case based on the context. However this feature is a bit different. It is based on the recent choices the developer made.

 

[Robert Loiacono]

Thank you, Erel.

 

[GGSoft]

Spoiler

Most (Recently | Frecuently) used item preselected?

My guess.

 

[AHilton]

Is there any way to turn this off? Ever since B4J V5.82 came out, it's frequently wrong in choosing. It makes for very frustrating coding. The way auto-complete worked before worked quite well.

 

[Erel]

Currently it is not possible to disable it. However it is improved in the next version. You can test it in the beta version:
www.b4x.com/b4j/files/beta.exe

 

[LucaMs]

but I have to write that now I'm really appreciating this new feature.