LucaMs Expert Licensed User Longtime User Feb 6, 2022 #1 https://www.b4x.com/android/forum/t...ding-receiving-binary-data.110383/post-688922
agraham Expert Licensed User Longtime User Feb 6, 2022 #2 Why? The limitation is in jServer and you might want to use the client with a different server.
LucaMs Expert Licensed User Longtime User Feb 6, 2022 #3 agraham said: Why? The limitation is in jServer and you might want to use the client with a different server. Click to expand... How?
agraham said: Why? The limitation is in jServer and you might want to use the client with a different server. Click to expand... How?
agraham Expert Licensed User Longtime User Feb 6, 2022 #4 LucaMs said: How? Click to expand... Why not. jWebSocketClient appears to be wrap of org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.client.WebSocketClient - a standard websocket implementation. I see nothing jServer specific in the library.
LucaMs said: How? Click to expand... Why not. jWebSocketClient appears to be wrap of org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.client.WebSocketClient - a standard websocket implementation. I see nothing jServer specific in the library.
Erel B4X founder Staff member Licensed User Longtime User Feb 7, 2022 #5 agraham said: Why? The limitation is in jServer and you might want to use the client with a different server. Click to expand... Very true. It is not exactly a limitation, it is more of a different use case. jServer WebSocket was built to interact with browsers (and in a specific way). It is not a generic WebSocket server.
agraham said: Why? The limitation is in jServer and you might want to use the client with a different server. Click to expand... Very true. It is not exactly a limitation, it is more of a different use case. jServer WebSocket was built to interact with browsers (and in a specific way). It is not a generic WebSocket server.
LucaMs Expert Licensed User Longtime User Feb 7, 2022 #6 So, rather than eliminating that method, it would be useful to have a B4J one in order to directly receive an array of bytes sent via SendBinary. In this regard, I'm about to write a new Wish without much hope ?
So, rather than eliminating that method, it would be useful to have a B4J one in order to directly receive an array of bytes sent via SendBinary. In this regard, I'm about to write a new Wish without much hope ?
