Work in progress...

[Erel]

Note that you can copy text directly from the list items and you can also jump to an exact position by double clicking or pressing enter.

 

[Daestrum]

I know it's a work in progress but my initial reaction is , it's very hard to see the search term in the lines. Would it be possible to add a background colour to highlight the search term in the lines shown.

 

[LucaMs]

I like it. Do you think it is possible to indicate not only the module but also the routine?

Perhaps this will also lead to LogColor in b4j?

 

[Erel]

it's very hard to see the search term in the lines. Would it be possible to add a background colour to highlight the search term in the lines shown.

I actually started with a background color however it looked too messy. The highlighting is not too important as you know that the search term appears in each of these lines.

Do you think it is possible to indicate not only the module but also the routine?

The main challenge is in the UI side as there isn't too much space available. Will see...

Perhaps this will also lead to LogColor in b4j?

This is not related to the logs feature.

 

[LucaMs]

This is not related to the logs feature.

I know, but I thought that since you were modifying the way of displaying text in the Quick Search Tab, maybe it will be possible to do it also in the b4j Logs Tab

 

[sorex]

maybe underlining as alternative to coloring?

but indeed you're right that you know the search string is there when the line shows up.

 

[LucaMs]

maybe underlining as alternative to coloring?

+1

 

[Erel]

Here:

 

[EnriqueGonzalez]

this wil be a life saver! how many times i keep looking for that sql.close line that i forget to put. now i will be able to track it down more easly!

 

[LucaMs]

this wil be a life saver!

What an exaggeration

 

[EnriqueGonzalez]

What an exaggeration

just imagine that i increased the connection pool by 100 hundred because i never actually found the missed sql.close

 

[LucaMs]

just imagine that i increased the connection pool by 100 hundred because i never actually found the missed sql.close

True, you could have died instantly!

 

[EnriqueGonzalez]

True, you could have died instantly!

yes! who know when the limit of 5 could be reached. what if it was when a presentation with the customer, or when the customer needed it the most, have you heard the phrase. "death by sorrow"?

 

[EnriqueGonzalez]

"death by sorrow"

or harakiri by the japanese?

 

[Alexander Stolte]

just imagine that i increased the connection pool by 100 hundred because i never actually found the missed sql.close

the sql.close is your missing ";"

 

[EnriqueGonzalez]

the sql.close is your missing ";"

almost! is a bit worse! without ; you can't compile it. the sql.close is a silent assassin.

 

[rabbitBUSH]

the sql.close is your missing ";"

AH.... THAT'S THE ONE! Now @Enrique Gonzalez R, where Was the missing sql.Close? Even @Erel searching might not be that good....

 

[EnriqueGonzalez]

AH.... THAT'S THE ONE! Now @Enrique Gonzalez R, where Was the missing sql.Close? Even @Erel searching might not be that good....

I am still waiting for the next b4j versión. Meanwhile 100 simultaneous connections. Aren't that bad