Erel B4X founder Staff member Licensed User Longtime User Nov 11, 2019 #1 Note that you can copy text directly from the list items and you can also jump to an exact position by double clicking or pressing enter.
Note that you can copy text directly from the list items and you can also jump to an exact position by double clicking or pressing enter.
Daestrum Expert Licensed User Longtime User Nov 11, 2019 #2 I know it's a work in progress but my initial reaction is , it's very hard to see the search term in the lines. Would it be possible to add a background colour to highlight the search term in the lines shown.
I know it's a work in progress but my initial reaction is , it's very hard to see the search term in the lines. Would it be possible to add a background colour to highlight the search term in the lines shown.
LucaMs Expert Licensed User Longtime User Nov 11, 2019 #3 I like it. Do you think it is possible to indicate not only the module but also the routine? Perhaps this will also lead to LogColor in b4j?
I like it. Do you think it is possible to indicate not only the module but also the routine? Perhaps this will also lead to LogColor in b4j?
Erel B4X founder Staff member Licensed User Longtime User Nov 11, 2019 #4 Daestrum said: it's very hard to see the search term in the lines. Would it be possible to add a background colour to highlight the search term in the lines shown. Click to expand... I actually started with a background color however it looked too messy. The highlighting is not too important as you know that the search term appears in each of these lines. LucaMs said: Do you think it is possible to indicate not only the module but also the routine? Click to expand... The main challenge is in the UI side as there isn't too much space available. Will see... LucaMs said: Perhaps this will also lead to LogColor in b4j? Click to expand... This is not related to the logs feature.
Daestrum said: it's very hard to see the search term in the lines. Would it be possible to add a background colour to highlight the search term in the lines shown. Click to expand... I actually started with a background color however it looked too messy. The highlighting is not too important as you know that the search term appears in each of these lines. LucaMs said: Do you think it is possible to indicate not only the module but also the routine? Click to expand... The main challenge is in the UI side as there isn't too much space available. Will see... LucaMs said: Perhaps this will also lead to LogColor in b4j? Click to expand... This is not related to the logs feature.
LucaMs Expert Licensed User Longtime User Nov 11, 2019 #5 Erel said: This is not related to the logs feature. Click to expand... I know, but I thought that since you were modifying the way of displaying text in the Quick Search Tab, maybe it will be possible to do it also in the b4j Logs Tab
Erel said: This is not related to the logs feature. Click to expand... I know, but I thought that since you were modifying the way of displaying text in the Quick Search Tab, maybe it will be possible to do it also in the b4j Logs Tab
S sorex Expert Licensed User Longtime User Nov 11, 2019 #6 maybe underlining as alternative to coloring? but indeed you're right that you know the search string is there when the line shows up.
maybe underlining as alternative to coloring? but indeed you're right that you know the search string is there when the line shows up.
LucaMs Expert Licensed User Longtime User Nov 11, 2019 #7 sorex said: maybe underlining as alternative to coloring? Click to expand... +1
EnriqueGonzalez Expert Licensed User Longtime User Nov 12, 2019 #9 this wil be a life saver! how many times i keep looking for that sql.close line that i forget to put. now i will be able to track it down more easly!
this wil be a life saver! how many times i keep looking for that sql.close line that i forget to put. now i will be able to track it down more easly!
LucaMs Expert Licensed User Longtime User Nov 12, 2019 #10 Enrique Gonzalez R said: this wil be a life saver! Click to expand... What an exaggeration
EnriqueGonzalez Expert Licensed User Longtime User Nov 12, 2019 #11 LucaMs said: What an exaggeration Click to expand... just imagine that i increased the connection pool by 100 hundred because i never actually found the missed sql.close
LucaMs said: What an exaggeration Click to expand... just imagine that i increased the connection pool by 100 hundred because i never actually found the missed sql.close
LucaMs Expert Licensed User Longtime User Nov 12, 2019 #12 Enrique Gonzalez R said: just imagine that i increased the connection pool by 100 hundred because i never actually found the missed sql.close Click to expand... True, you could have died instantly!
Enrique Gonzalez R said: just imagine that i increased the connection pool by 100 hundred because i never actually found the missed sql.close Click to expand... True, you could have died instantly!
EnriqueGonzalez Expert Licensed User Longtime User Nov 12, 2019 #13 LucaMs said: True, you could have died instantly! Click to expand... yes! who know when the limit of 5 could be reached. what if it was when a presentation with the customer, or when the customer needed it the most, have you heard the phrase. "death by sorrow"?
LucaMs said: True, you could have died instantly! Click to expand... yes! who know when the limit of 5 could be reached. what if it was when a presentation with the customer, or when the customer needed it the most, have you heard the phrase. "death by sorrow"?
EnriqueGonzalez Expert Licensed User Longtime User Nov 12, 2019 #14 Enrique Gonzalez R said: "death by sorrow" Click to expand... or harakiri by the japanese?
Alexander Stolte Expert Licensed User Longtime User Nov 12, 2019 #15 Enrique Gonzalez R said: just imagine that i increased the connection pool by 100 hundred because i never actually found the missed sql.close Click to expand... the sql.close is your missing ";"
Enrique Gonzalez R said: just imagine that i increased the connection pool by 100 hundred because i never actually found the missed sql.close Click to expand... the sql.close is your missing ";"
EnriqueGonzalez Expert Licensed User Longtime User Nov 12, 2019 #16 Alexander Stolte said: the sql.close is your missing ";" Click to expand... almost! is a bit worse! without ; you can't compile it. the sql.close is a silent assassin.
Alexander Stolte said: the sql.close is your missing ";" Click to expand... almost! is a bit worse! without ; you can't compile it. the sql.close is a silent assassin.
rabbitBUSH Well-Known Member Licensed User Longtime User Nov 17, 2019 #17 Alexander Stolte said: the sql.close is your missing ";" Click to expand... AH.... THAT'S THE ONE! Now @Enrique Gonzalez R, where Was the missing sql.Close? Even @Erel searching might not be that good....
Alexander Stolte said: the sql.close is your missing ";" Click to expand... AH.... THAT'S THE ONE! Now @Enrique Gonzalez R, where Was the missing sql.Close? Even @Erel searching might not be that good....
EnriqueGonzalez Expert Licensed User Longtime User Nov 17, 2019 #18 rabbitBUSH said: AH.... THAT'S THE ONE! Now @Enrique Gonzalez R, where Was the missing sql.Close? Even @Erel searching might not be that good.... Click to expand... I am still waiting for the next b4j versión. Meanwhile 100 simultaneous connections. Aren't that bad
rabbitBUSH said: AH.... THAT'S THE ONE! Now @Enrique Gonzalez R, where Was the missing sql.Close? Even @Erel searching might not be that good.... Click to expand... I am still waiting for the next b4j versión. Meanwhile 100 simultaneous connections. Aren't that bad
