I came across a post that shows speed test app in b4j. So I decided to adopt it to b4a. Here is the result
[ https://youtube.com/shorts/WM1bi63I_N8 ]
[ https://youtube.com/shorts/WM1bi63I_N8 ]
Attachments
Last edited:
-
Welcome to B4X forum!
B4X is a set of simple and powerful cross platform RAD tools:
- B4A (free) - Android development
- B4J (free) - Desktop and Server development
- B4i - iOS development
- B4R (free) - Arduino, ESP8266 and ESP32 development
Share My Creation Speed Test
- Thread starter jkhazraji
- Start date
- Similar Threads Similar Threads
My intention is as good as yours, which I appreciate, and it is mainly to present things good to the others. Profit from money to me is not a goal in this forum. I am, in no way, qualified to tell you what is wrong or right. It was a cordial misunderstanding, maybe. You are expert and I am active member
.
.
This is censorship, and to make things worse, @aeric did what the OP asked... I, for one, would very much want to read what aeric wrote, as he often make statements to the point.
Hello everyone,
I often lack the time to participate in the forum; I'm busy.
But today, I'm disappointed. On a forum more focused on free software rather than paid licenses, and also on mutual support, someone is trying to sell a product he didn't even create, simply integrated into another product in the B4X suite…
That's not development, that's plagiarism!
Might as well do what too many others do and use an AI programming without debugging anything…
It's absurd, but this nonsense seems to be in vogue.
As Cableguy said, it would be interesting to know @aeric's opinion on this. What's the meaning of this incomprehensible censorship?
For me, it's inconceivable to try to sell something like that. Even if it takes time, it was stay a good learning exercise for developing the different components of a suite. It's shameful! Especially since the author said so and refused to let anyone sell it.
That's my personal opinion, but it seems good to repeat it, especialy after what happen in this flow.
I often lack the time to participate in the forum; I'm busy.
But today, I'm disappointed. On a forum more focused on free software rather than paid licenses, and also on mutual support, someone is trying to sell a product he didn't even create, simply integrated into another product in the B4X suite…
That's not development, that's plagiarism!
Might as well do what too many others do and use an AI programming without debugging anything…
It's absurd, but this nonsense seems to be in vogue.
As Cableguy said, it would be interesting to know @aeric's opinion on this. What's the meaning of this incomprehensible censorship?
For me, it's inconceivable to try to sell something like that. Even if it takes time, it was stay a good learning exercise for developing the different components of a suite. It's shameful! Especially since the author said so and refused to let anyone sell it.
That's my personal opinion, but it seems good to repeat it, especialy after what happen in this flow.
Who want to read my previous message, it is still quoted in post #12.
I understand I have the right to voice my thought and I don't need to follow what the OP said. I removed it because I don't want it appear annoying to the OP. I leave it to the member who quoted my message in post #12 whether he wants to remove it.
I think the OP is really respecting the original source author. He already edited his first post to stop selling the code.
The code posted here was a B4A version ported from a B4J version, which took the OP some effort since the task is not easy.
I think this is a lesson learn on the question related to respecting others work.
When we want to sell a work derived from another work, it is best to make a confirmation with the original author for permission even though it is not stated clearly or not.
I hope this is clear. Let's don't have bad feeling to the OP. I think we should stop discussing further.
I understand I have the right to voice my thought and I don't need to follow what the OP said. I removed it because I don't want it appear annoying to the OP. I leave it to the member who quoted my message in post #12 whether he wants to remove it.
I think the OP is really respecting the original source author. He already edited his first post to stop selling the code.
The code posted here was a B4A version ported from a B4J version, which took the OP some effort since the task is not easy.
I think this is a lesson learn on the question related to respecting others work.
When we want to sell a work derived from another work, it is best to make a confirmation with the original author for permission even though it is not stated clearly or not.
I hope this is clear. Let's don't have bad feeling to the OP. I think we should stop discussing further.
I completely agree. This thread should be closed.
@jkhazraji ...i think that video is not availiable may be not shared as public by your side - that's because you can see it - and not seeing by other members of forum...
For the other things - I am not sure why must close the thread.. If jkhazraji says that code for b4a is "his code" - i believe him...
I mean the code for b4a... //if original code was b4j... can mention the other member... and if asking for "money" for the code - give the money to other member...
but hey! where is the code ?
* Anyway money is the last thing / the target in this forum must be the code....
For the other things - I am not sure why must close the thread.. If jkhazraji says that code for b4a is "his code" - i believe him...
I mean the code for b4a... //if original code was b4j... can mention the other member... and if asking for "money" for the code - give the money to other member...
but hey! where is the code ?
* Anyway money is the last thing / the target in this forum must be the code....
Similar Threads
- Article
