I think AI is a fantastic tool to draw a correct conclusion based on ever-increasing experience, such as cancer research from breast images. But I see similarities with a static approach, the larger the collection, the more accurate the conclusion. A creative approach is more based on letting go of everything, in order to look at it in a completely different way. But then AI lacks or has too small a collection of facts to give a statically sound answer. Then it seems that AI, based on the interpretation, seems to choose the statistically most likely choice. based on the question. Handy to be helped on your way if you have heard the bell tolling, but do not know exactly where the clapper is, as long as you realize that the answer may not necessarily be correct.