Deleting posts in conversations

[LucaMs]

Is there any reason not to allow this?

 

[Erel]

I never thought about it too much, but there is a difference between private and public posts. I think about someone who closes a deal with another forum member and both expect the private posts to remain accessible.

 

[Magma]

@Erel ....sometimes need them... for proof

 

[mcqueccu]

Yes, its good to go back for proof when edit was not present. But
Recently, edit was enabled and the parties can edit their conversation, which will make getting that proof difficult

 

[Erel]

Recently, edit was enabled and the parties can edit their conversation, which will make getting that proof difficult

I've added a limit of 60 minutes for editing conversations posts.

 

[Star-Dust]

I always get the proof by replaying the previous message

 

[Cableguy]

Yes, its good to go back for proof when edit was not present. But
Recently, edit was enabled and the parties can edit their conversation, which will make getting that proof difficult

this was why I wasn't to "in favor" of this...

 

[emexes]

I always get the proof by replaying the previous message

I always get the proof by replying the previous message

Is soft proof.

Wait 60 minutes if need hard proof.

I've added a limit of 60 minutes for editing conversations posts.

 

[Star-Dust]

Is hard proof.

Wait 60 minutes if need soft proof.

Why?